« Colour geometry | Main | Shop front, Colorado »

April 28, 2020


Recruiting Animal

He seems to be saying that no group has a claim to the land it is on no matter how long they have been living there because all residence is ultimately based on conquest be it in the recent or distant past. Then he says that the current residents are not guilty of this original sin but they have to accept its logic anyway. At least, I think that this is what he is saying. But I've read Wilf a few times and I think I remember her saying something about indigenous people having a legitimate claim.

Mick H

Well...he's saying that the Arabs base the morality of their claims on the belief that the Jews stole their land, when they're guilty of the same charge back in the days of the Arabic conquests post-Mohammed. I don't think that necessarily implies that it's conquests all the way down.

The comments to this entry are closed.