Turning into an arsehole

It's a slippery slope alright. Start reading someone like Sam Harris, who's critical of Islam (and, as it happens, all religions), and before you know it you're a fully-fledged alt-right racist and "Islamophobe". Fortunately a brave soul at the Guardian's CiF has come back from the realm of the damned to issue this timely - and terrifying - warning:

I am a happily married, young white man. I grew up in a happy, Conservative household. I’ve spent my entire life – save the last four months – as a progressive liberal. All of my friends are very liberal or left-leaning centrists. I have always voted Liberal Democrat or Green. I voted remain in the referendum. The thought of racism in any form has always been abhorrent to me. When leave won, I was devastated.

I was curious as to the motives of leave voters. Surely they were not all racist, bigoted or hateful? I watched some debates on YouTube. Obvious points of concern about terrorism were brought up. A leaver cited Sam Harris as a source. I looked him up: this “intellectual, free-thinker” was very critical of Islam. Naturally my liberal kneejerk reaction was to be shocked, but I listened to his concerns and some of his debates.

This, I think, is where YouTube’s “suggested videos” can lead you down a rabbit hole. Moving on from Harris, I unlocked the Pandora’s box of “It’s not racist to criticise Islam!” content. Eventually I was introduced, by YouTube algorithms, to Milo Yiannopoulos and various “anti-SJW” videos (SJW, or social justice warrior, is a pejorative directed at progressives). They were shocking at first, but always presented as innocuous criticism from people claiming to be liberals themselves, or centrists, sometimes “just a regular conservative” – but never, ever identifying as the dreaded “alt-right”....

On one occasion I even, I am ashamed to admit, very diplomatically expressed negative sentiments on Islam to my wife. Nothing “overtly racist”, just some of the “innocuous” type of things the YouTubers had presented: “Islam isn’t compatible with western civilisation.”

She was taken aback: “Isn’t that a bit … rightwing?”

I justified it: “Well, I’m more a left-leaning centrist. PC culture has gone too far, we should be able to discuss these things without shutting down the conversation by calling people racist, or bigots.”

The indoctrination was complete.

About a week before the US election, I heard one of these YouTubers use the phrase “red-pilled” – a term from the film The Matrix – in reference to people being awakened to the truth about the world and SJWs. Suddenly I thought: “This is exactly like a cult. What am I doing? I’m turning into an arsehole.”

I unsubscribed and unfollowed from everything, and told myself outright: “You’re becoming a racist. What you’re doing is turning you into a terrible, hateful person.” Until that moment I hadn’t even realised that “alt-right” was what I was becoming; I just thought I was a more open-minded person for tolerating these views....

It seemed so subtle – at no point did I think my casual and growing Islamophobia was genuine racism. The good news for me is that my journey toward the alt-right was mercifully brief: I never wanted to harm or abuse anybody verbally, it was all very low level – a creeping fear and bigotry that I won’t let infest me again. But I suspect you could, if you don’t catch it quickly, be guided into a much more overt and sinister hatred.

I haven’t yet told my wife that this happened, and I honestly don’t know how to. I need to apologise for what I said and tell her that I certainly don’t believe it. It is going to be a tough conversation and I’m not looking forward to it. I didn’t think this could happen to me. But it did and it will haunt me for a long time to come.

Is this a joke? It would certainly be hard to beat as a satirical piss-take of the cliched Guardian reader: overcome with guilt when he realises that, if only for a short while, he dared to think that there might be a problem with Islam.

The author's anonymous, and it's not open for comments - and you can see why. Guardian commenters are not, on the whole, my favourite demographic, but this ghastly drivel would be torn to shreds in no time at all.

Update: This is one of the best trolls of 2016.

Comments

[LibertyPhile]

If you study the comments and the votes on the comments on any article in the Guardian to do with Islam, you will see they are overwhelmingly critical of Islam or whatever argument is being pushed to explain some objectionable Islamic belief or behaviour.

And, judging by the quality (spelling, grammar, punctuation) and the length of comments they really are Guardian readers, and not trolls from the Daily Mail or the BNP.

It is a remarkable publishing phenomenon. On the subject of Islam the Guardian is totally out of step with its readers.

There is a survey of it which you can see here: https://islamsurveyed.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/readersdontmatter-attheguardian.pdf

The irony is the Guardian could do more to help Muslims by being sensibly critical at least some of the time and by supporting Muslim reformers, instead of being so-wilfully one sided, and publishing vomit inducing material such as this latest piece. No wonder comments are OFF.

[Richard Powell]

I'd go for a spoof, with about 80% probability. Among the things which seem particularly suspicious are "I grew up in a happy, Conservative household" and "the author was not paid a fee for this piece".

Whether spoof or not, I'm consistently mystified by the conflation of Islamophobia and racism. Islamophobes worry about Islam[ism], rather than about Muslims, who are very obviously not a race - though one can be accused of racism for pointing this out. Anyone who refuses to make such distinctions is either (to put it politely) suffering from cognitive difficulties or deliberately muddying the waters. Given what we know of Guardian contributors either seems equally likely.

An interesting comment from LibertyPhile. I too have noticed a disjunction between Guardian articles and the comments below the line, and I suspect this is reflected in its financial difficulties. I recently encountered an on-screen questionnaire which asked how the Guardian would need to change before I was willing to pay for it. So I told them. (Cut the identity politics and cultivate basic numeracy.)

[Epidermoid]

Clever satire I think but clever enough to deceive. "I have always voted Green or Lib Dem" is a give away. he could have tagged on,"and always read the Guardian" but resisted.

[Graham]

Well, there is this: https://mobile.twitter.com/GodfreyElfwick/status/803687334482939904

[Dom]

So it was Elfwick! He's the one bright spot on Twitter. I noticed that Glenn Greenwald took it seriously.

[Mick H]

I'd never heard of him before. I must stay in more.

[Dom]

Elfwick says he was once an atheist but was disturbed by the casual islamophobia of atheism, so he converted to moderate Islam. Last year he appeared on the bbc to complain about the racism of Star Wars with characters like "Dark Raider", and no one corrected him. A lot of his parodies turn out later to be true. He claimed he was transitioning to a black man before the Rachel Dolezal and Shaun King mess.