"Sounds like a case for Interpol, sarge."
The latest in the saga of Saudi tweeter Hamza Kashgari (here and here for background):
Interpol has been accused of abusing its powers after Saudi Arabia used the organisation's red notice system to get a journalist arrested in Malaysia for insulting the Prophet Muhammad.
Police in Kuala Lumpur said Hamza Kashgari, 23, was detained at the airport "following a request made to us by Interpol" the international police cooperation agency, on behalf of the Saudi authorities.
Kashgari, a newspaper columnist, fled Saudi Arabia after posting a tweet on the prophet's birthday that sparked more than 30,000 responses and several death threats. The posting, which was later deleted, read: "I have loved things about you and I have hated things about you and there is a lot I don't understand about you … I will not pray for you."
More than 13,000 people joined a Facebook page titled "The Saudi People Demand the Execution of Hamza Kashgari".
Clerics in Saudi Arabia called for him to be charged with apostasy, a religious offence punishable by death. Reports suggest that the Malaysian authorities intend to return him to his native country.
Kashgari's detention has triggered criticism by human rights groups of Malaysia's decision to arrest the journalist and of Interpol's cooperation in the process.
Jago Russell, the chief executive of the British charity Fair Trials International, which has campaigned against the blanket enforcement of Interpol red notices, said: "Interpol should be playing no part in Saudi Arabia's pursuit of Hamza Kashgari, however unwise his comments on Twitter.
"If an Interpol red notice is the reason for his arrest and detention it would be a serious abuse of this powerful international body that is supposed to respect basic human rights (including to peaceful free speech) and to be barred from any involvement in religious or political cases."
He called on Interpol to stand by its obligations to fundamental human rights and "to comply with its obligation not to play any part in this case, which is clearly of a religious nature".
Interpol, which has 190 member countries, has a series of coloured notice systems that police forces around the world use to pass on requests for help. Contacted at its headquarters in Lyon, France, the organisation did not immediately reply to requests for comment on the Kashgari case.
From Wiki:
In order to maintain as politically neutral a role as possible, Interpol's constitution forbids it to undertake any interventions or activities of a political, military, religious, or racial nature. Its work focuses primarily on public safety, terrorism, organized crime, crimes against humanity, environmental crime, genocide, war crimes, piracy, illicit drug production, drug trafficking, weapons smuggling,human trafficking, money laundering, child pornography, white-collar crime, computer crime, intellectual property crime and corruption...
...and making slightly less than adulatory remarks about the Prophet, of course.
Now the poor man's been sent back to Saudi Arabia to await his fate, with a conviction of blasphemy followed by a swift decapitation very much on the cards.
Update: The Guardian article has now been amended to include Interpol's denial of any involvement - "The assertion that Saudi Arabia used Interpol's system in this case is wholly misleading and erroneous."
Update 2: MP Denis MacShane clearly thinks Interpol have a case to answer.
Goddam outrage.
Posted by: Ophelia Benson | February 13, 2012 at 12:54 AM
Mick, apparently Interpol have denied they had any role in Kashgari's arrest and deportation (see amended story here):
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/feb/10/interpol-journalist-arrested-muhammad-tweet
Posted by: sackcloth and ashes | February 13, 2012 at 11:41 AM
OK thanks. I'll update.
Posted by: Mick H | February 13, 2012 at 12:18 PM