Repressed man-hating lesbians

So who else is bitterly opposed to intervention in Libya? Predictably enough, Tariq Ali:

The US-Nato intervention in Libya, with United Nations security council cover, is part of an orchestrated response to show support for the movement against one dictator in particular and by so doing to bring the Arab rebellions to an end by asserting western control, confiscating their impetus and spontaneity and trying to restore the status quo ante.

It is absurd to think that the reasons for bombing Tripoli or for the turkey shoot outside Benghazi are designed to protect civilians. This particular argument is designed to win support from the citizens of Euro-America and part of the Arab world. "Look at us," say Obama/Clinton and the EU satraps, "we're doing good. We're on the side of the people." The sheer cynicism is breathtaking. We're expected to believe that the leaders with bloody hands in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan are defending the people in Libya. The debased British and French media are capable of swallowing anything, but the fact that decent liberals still fall for this rubbish is depressing.

On the contrary: the cynicism here - cheap rather than breathtaking - is Ali's. How about this charming slur:

The US state department is busy preparing a new government composed of English-speaking Libyan collaborators.

Anti-Gaddafi equals collaborator. This comment sums it all up nicely.

Or let's go to English Pravda, where it's all - of course - about the oil (thanks Dom):

So who is the crazy one? Obviously that gang of lunatics savagely launching attacks on Libya based on the worst collection of lies in the history of the world. If you want to know where they are headed, just look at their track record, littered with genocide, theft and destruction.

More and more evidence is surfacing that this entire operation has been planned from outside (read U.S. and EU) for quite some time. First surround (Egypt and Tunisia), then invade. Wesley Clarke revealed the laundry list which included Libya.

In the U.S., there is a particulary motley group of interventionist war mongers who don't know what they're doing: Susan Rice, Hillary Clinton and Samantha Power, obviously sexually frustrated and repressed man hating lesbians who want to prove they are he-men.

We are also seeing attacks on residential areas, many civilians being killed. There have been attacks on Ghaddafi's living area, a clear attempt at assassination. Today intelligence also reports they plan a ground invasion. The fascists of the west never change. The term "humanitarian bombing" reminds of George Orwell doublespeak.

One can only heartily agree on Gaddafi's statement: They are "a group of crazy fascists that will end in the garbage dump of history."

History will surely judge them on the same page as Adolph Hitler.

Classy, eh?

Comments

[Bob-B]

Ali may find it impossible to believe that the West is defending the people in Libya, but lacking Ali's sophistication, plenty of Libyans believe it. Ali probably sees himself as a revolutionary. If so, he's a very bizarre kind of revolutionary, one who would rather see a revolution drowned in blood than have it defended by the West.

[sackcloth and ashes]

Tariq Ali, the self-proclaimed 'street-fighting' man, aligns himself with a despot against those who seek to overthrow him. I don't know why I'm not surprised ...